Archives

Tagged ‘science‘

Divine Software Process Methodology

Something a few friends and I are working on – you have to suspend belief for a bit (sic) and turn your humour gauge down to childish. If you’ve a principle/rule that fits, feel free to add via a comment!

The Divine Software Process Methodology is the source of all software methodologies. It came before them all, and it will outlast them all. Following DSPM ensures that:

  1. The software is magnificent – it is born ready to ship!
  2. The software is immaculate – so you don’t need pair programming, one engineer is enough and so you save on cost!
  3. The software is omniscient – so you don’t need to waste time on requirements, it already knows what you want!
  4. The software is perfect – so you need not test, it just works!
  5. The software is eternal – there is no need to work on version 1.01, instant savings!
  6. The software is all things to all people – so there is no need to research or work on S versions, or Mini versions or even Pro versions!
  7. The software is omnipresent – so you don’t have to decide which platform or mobile form factor to code for!
  8. The software is universal – so it is easy to globalise, everyone just gets it!
  9. The software is bigger than the biggest thing – so forget marketing it, its just too big to miss!
  10. The software is smaller than the smallest thing – so don’t waste time making it smaller or lighter!
  11. The software is ethereal – so its agile enough to get through the tightest spots in your budget or schedule!

The only thing the software is not sure about, is whether its free….

Supermassive Black Holes!

Whao!

They’re huge. They’re voracious. They’re blacker than a panther on a moonless night. They’re black holes, the mind-bending, space-warping cosmic objects with gravity so insanely powerful that even a beam of light that wanders too close will be sucked in, never to emerge. Einstein’s theory of general relativity predicted they might exist, but the great physicist himself doubted it would really happen.

Einstein was wrong. Over the past decade or two, black holes have been discovered all over the place — small ones peppered around the Milky Way and huge ones, impressively called “supermassive” black holes, lurking the centers of galaxies. The one at the core of Milky Way weighs as much as a couple of million stars, and it could swallow the sun without even noticing, the way you’d swallow a pistachio. (See how X-ray vision gives great views of black holes.)

But that’s positively puny compared with the two new black holes, each about 330 million light-years away or so, just announced in the journal Nature. The smaller one, located inside a galaxy known as NGC 3842, is as massive as 9.7 billion suns, and the other, in a galaxy called NGC 4889, is more than twice as large: if you put it on a very large balance, it would take at least 21 billion stars to even things out. Another way to think about things: even the smaller of the two is nearly 30% bigger than the previous record holder, announced last winter, and it would make for a great storyline if astronomers were surprised, amazed, flabbergasted, blown away by the awesome giganticness of these monsters. Truthfully, though, they kind of expected it. “If we infer the existence of quasar black holes of ten billion solar masses at early cosmic times,” Harvard theorist Avi Loeb told Nature‘s Ron Cowen for the journal’s online news blog, “we’d better find their counterparts in the present-day Universe.”

Loeb is referring to quasars — beacons of light so intensely bright they can be seen halfway across the universe. When astronomers first spotted them in the late 1950s, nobody knew what they were. Nowadays, everyone pretty much agrees that quasars are supermassive black holes at the cores of young galaxies. The holes themselves aren’t visible, of course, but when they suck in surrounding matter, the stuff heats up to millions of degrees, sending bursts of energy shooting across the cosmos. (Read about how a black hole drank 140 trillion earths’ worth of water.)

Back when the universe was young, there was plenty of gas floating around to feed these monsters. Nowadays, much of it the gas is gone, and so are the quasars — but the black holes that powered them should, as Loeb says, still be around (where would they go, after all?). Now, thanks to some of the world’s most powerful telescopes, astronomers know that indeed they are. While scientists can’t see the black holes directly, they can see stars whipping around at high speeds in the two galaxies’ cores — and by clocking those speeds carefully, the astronomers can calculate how big and how dense the object they’re orbiting must be. In each of these cases, nothing but a supermassive black hole fits the bill.

Such observations are technically difficult, so in one sense the latest black-hole discoveries are extraordinary. Still, astronomers expected to find such things all along, so it might not seem like such a big deal to space experts. Indeed, Martin Rees, the British astronomer royal, dubbed the new results “an incremental step” in the New York Times, with nary a word about shock or awe. If you’ve got a professional interest in how black holes were born and how they evolved, this is more grist for the mill.

For the rest of us — well, they’re just kind of awesome.

source – time magazine, excellent article. check it out!